🗳️

Voting Activities

Proposal📡 ProtocolOur VoteType of VoteRationaleURLVote Date
Against
Off-chain
This should be evaluated based on a specific framework and by a group of members who are experienced in gaming and its grant system.
February 11, 2024
Against
Off-chain
We appreciate all the work put by Arbiters during the launch of Arbitrum, but are against their retro rewards because 1) they have already received some compensations from the Foundation. 2) there were no key measurements or criteria set for the rewards when it comes to managing the Discord community. It should have been clearly discussed beforehand with the Foundation or whoever manages the Discord or local communities.
February 11, 2024
For
Off-chain
Both changes make sense and the code is simple with unit tests and audit by ToB.
February 11, 2024
For
Off-chain
Great step to experiment treasury diversifications with a group of experienced service providers to lead the program
February 7, 2024
For
Off-chain
The motivation and implementations are reasonable and we believe this change leads to a better election process of the Security Council members.
February 4, 2024
Yes
On-chain
JUP is an upcoming and promising token for the dYdX to add to the market and see the data to be ready for the permissionless market introduction
February 4, 2024
For
On-chain
It’s favorable to form a committee to be specialized in procurement for the DAO and we have a great selection of members working on this initiative.
February 3, 2024
Yes
On-chain
We appreciate rigorous and thorough analysis on the first distribution of the launch incentives by Chaos Labs and look forward to the coming distributions
January 29, 2024
Yes
On-chain
We are in full support of the Foundation to keep their work within dYdX and collaborate with us and other stakeholders.
January 29, 2024
Weighted Choices
Off-chain
Voted 40% for Joseph as he should lead the committee, voted 30% each for Jeff and Bernard to support him with ample experiences that they have
January 29, 2024
Described in page
Off-chain
To achieve the revised Stage1 designation, we believe increasing the threshold to 9/12 is the vital first step to improve the council
January 24, 2024
For
On-chain
Now that the CoC exists in Optimism Collective, it makes sense to rely on it to properly manage the issues around grant misusage with the process clearly ratified.
January 24, 2024
For
On-chain
“Span Batches” to be introduced with this upgrade reduces the L1 costs for OP chains, which is nothing but great for the Optimism ecosystem.
January 24, 2024
Yes
On-chain
Introducing the ICA host submodule and other improvements is welcome changes to the chain and we are in full support of the upgrade
January 24, 2024
For
On-chain
We believe this is the essential first step to rewards active delegates and continuous commitments from existing and new dedicated participants to the DAO. We appreciate the careful considerations and clearly outlined evaluation process.
January 22, 2024
For
On-chain
We are in support of the initiative to go forward after the diligent considerations and amendments made to improve the original proposal. It's great to see a democratic process to choose the service providers to address issues that have been discussed for a while.
January 22, 2024
Top Choices
Off-chain
Chose 3 candidates. Clarified the reasonings in the description.
January 21, 2024
Top Choices
Off-chain
January 21, 2024
Ranked Choices
Off-chain
An improved version of the STIP and we believe it's worth trying it as a pilot
January 9, 2024
For
On-chain
No reason to oppose to continuous updates to the Arbitrum stack
January 5, 2024
No
On-chain
Any changes to the chain state should be done when it’s absolutely required, and we don’t consider this case to be one of them.
January 5, 2024
Yes
Off-chain
We believe it’s a great idea to move governance for existing components into the new system
December 21, 2023
Yes
On-chain
We believe it’s a great addition to the dYdX to have TIA and upcoming tokens that have potential to attract more traders and volumes
December 21, 2023
Yes
On-chain
While 10% discount is not ideal for the DAO, Wintermute is dYdX’s one of the long-time partners and we believe it’s important to seed the insurance fund sooner rather than waiting for better offers.
December 18, 2023
For
On-chain
While we agree with the points that prominent delegates who voted abstain, we believe the motivation and the selection of the members are solid and meaningful for Optimism, thus we vote for the ratification of the council members selected by the Foundation.
December 5, 2023
For
On-chain
No objection to include well-tested and less critical changes to the protocol into the Optimism stacks. Side note: great summary of the upgrade in the forum, but the proposal description can better incorporate it with organized structure.
December 5, 2023
Yes
On-chain
While it’s not an ideal solution, the social committee approach is the best mitigation solution that we can apply at this point. We also expect the capable group of contributors to come up with a framework to better address the MEV in the future.
November 30, 2023
Yes
On-chain
It’s critical to move forward with the incentive programs despite the fact that there are still concerns on the centralization of staking to top X validators. We expect users/traders/stakers to stake more once the trading ramps up the volume and staking APR is available for them.
November 25, 2023
Top Choices
On-chain
Chose those three for their activities and contributions in the forum
November 15, 2023
Top Choices
On-chain
Chose Jack Anorak and Gonna.eth for their technical capabilities and Kaereste for their involvement as L2BEAT
November 15, 2023
Top Choices
On-chain
MMhurthy for his experiences in building Karma, Raho for his contributions to the Arbitrum STIP, and Curia for their continuous contributions to the protocols
November 15, 2023
For
On-chain
While many unclear points are not being discussed (e.g. how to select a chain and how much tokens to delegate, etc), this is important for the Optimism family to grow based on shared vision and aligned incentives
November 14, 2023
For
On-chain
It’s good for the Collective to be responsible for the budgets and spends on all Intents going forward in the coming Seasons. The budgets seem reasonable and we are looking forward to the outcome made by the initiatives supported by them.
November 14, 2023
For
On-chain
This is a critical step to structure rules for chains using OP Stack to be aligned and grow together as an alliance
November 14, 2023
Top Choices
On-chain
Chose 3 members for their experience in Optimism governance and 2 members for their expertises to be effective to resolve conflicts based on CoC
November 14, 2023
Yes
On-chain
We believe we are ready to go for the trading with all markets available on the dYdX Chain
November 10, 2023
Against
Off-chain
The idea of having an organization like this is appealing but the details, structure and framework need to be further discussed and reach to consensus before deciding to fund it
November 10, 2023
For
Off-chain
No reason to be against the idea of the consolidation
November 10, 2023
Against
Off-chain
DAO shouldn’t reward contributors without the information about who they are, what each of them has done and how they are selected and others are not.
October 31, 2023
Yes
Off-chain
This bridging of the Community and Rewards Treasuries is the critical step to properly bootstrap the dYdX Chain with the proposed Launch Incentive Program and other initiatives, and it’s important for the community to fully support its implementation and execution.
October 20, 2023
Top Choices
On-chain
The most important expertise required for a security council member is the deep knowledge with the protocol tech stacks and Harry, CTO of Offchain Labs is undoubtedly the best candidate.
October 13, 2023
Against
Off-chain
While we believe the security is paramountly important in the self-custody environment and what Webacy has been doing is clearly beneficial to the whole ecosystem, there are a couple of reasons that the proposal is not fit for STIP grant distributions: 1) the justification of the requested grant size is weak compared to the outcome. 2) incentives are prone to sybil attacks 3) not clear incentives to Arbitrum itself
October 12, 2023
For
Off-chain
Camelot kicked off this STIP movement, and diligently tried to get aligned with what it can do for Arbitrum throughout the process. Definitely beneficial for Arbitrum to have Camelot thrive as one of the household names.
October 12, 2023
Abstain
Off-chain
While Vertex is an interesting protocol to thrive in Arbitrum, we abstain because we are an Endorsed Delegate of dYdX which is the direct competitor of Vertex from users’ perspective.
October 12, 2023
For
Off-chain
Tally’s mission is to advance on-chain governance further and it’s aligned very well with L2 like Arbitrum because of its lower gas. The requested grant size is reasonable and we believe that the Tally team is diligently allocating them to the DAOs on Arbitrum, which would make impact on Arbitrum with the great governance tool.
October 12, 2023
Against
Off-chain
On top of the raised concerns around dominance of stETH in Ethereum, the justifications of the grant size seems weak and off as stETH related trading volume is already huge. We would like Lido to propose their request in another way, address concerns and focus on properly introducing the native stETH in Arbitrum.
October 12, 2023
For
Off-chain
unshETH is very unique and natively supported on Arbitrum. It’s good to contribute to decentralization of liquid staking tokens. The requested grant size is reasonable.
October 12, 2023
For
Off-chain
We’ve seen their founders active in the NYC crypto meetups and spoken highly of Arbitrum in terms of experiences on the platform. The reasonable requested grant size. We believe the incentive is to be used to promote more interesting use within the ecosystem.
October 12, 2023
For
Off-chain
Pendle is bringing interest derivative market into DeFi and evolving the ecosystem with unique offerings. The requested grant size is reasonable and set out to be used efficiently.
October 12, 2023
Abstain
Off-chain
While GMX is a leading protocol to thrive in Arbitrum, we abstain because we are an Endorsed Delegate of dYdX which is the direct competitor of GMX from users’ perspective.
October 12, 2023