Let’s improve our governance forum with three proposals.app feature integrations

We acknowledge the efforts made to adjust the proposal from a $200k two-year commitment down to $60k for one year, which indeed appears more reasonable. However, our fundamental concern remains unchanged regarding whether the proposed features (voting power tags, live votes, email notifications) genuinely deliver sufficient value relative to the cost. To reiterate clearly, we don’t dispute the appropriateness of the proposed costs in terms of hosting and technical execution per se, but we are unconvinced about the overall benefit to governance participation. Furthermore, echoing the @Arbitrum 's critical observation, it seems essential to approach these enhancements from a broader, strategic perspective of desired governance UX and functionality, rather than as isolated improvements. Without a clear, long-term vision and alignment on the ideal user experience for governance, we risk investing in incremental solutions that might not substantially contribute to that vision. If these features indeed form a foundational part of a strategic, long-term UX plan, the investment could be justified. However, if these improvements merely represent piecemeal enhancements, alternative, cost-effective approaches might be preferable.