Proposal | Our Vote | Rationale | Type of Vote | Voting URL | Vote Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
For | Given Gitcoin’s current financial situation, pursuing additional yield through the outlined treasury management strategy is both prudent and justified. The risks you’ve explained appear acceptable and manageable within reasonable control measures. | Off-chain | April 11, 2025 | ||
For | We voted **for** the proposal. Regarding the Community Rounds and the GTC Utility experiment, as per our previous comments, we see no outstanding issues. For the OSS Quadratic Funding rounds, we acknowledge that appropriate modification has been made on the dApps & Apps category, specifically limiting the matching cap to 5%. Concerning the Retroactive Funding metrics, we recognize that important ecosystem indicators are covered to a reasonable extent. However, we believe it would be beneficial to measure aspects closer to actual outcomes in the future – for example, (purely as an illustration) considering metrics like GitHub repository stars for the tooling category. We are keen to contribute to developing these aspects further. | Off-chain | March 31, 2025 |
Roles
Delegate