https://www.tally.xyz/gov/obol/delegate/0xb79294d00848a3a4c00c22d9367f19b4280689d7
Proposal | Our Vote | Rationale | Type of Vote | Voting URL | Vote Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIP #4 Delegate Compensation and Delegate Reputation Score Integration (stOBOL) | Against | We support the general direction of introduction to the delegate compensation and experimental DRS integration. However, similarly to other delegates point out, the software development cost shouldn’t be covered as this feature is an asset to Tally and likely be used for other DAOs in the future. We suggest Tally to apply for a future retro grant once it’s used by the DAO. | On-chain | www.tally.xyz | May 27, 2025 |
OIP#3 Obol Collective 2025 Goals | For | As we saw the success of Lido’s GOOSE framework and other DAOs like Arbitrum follow the similar path to align the stakeholders for the platform/protocol, we believe it’s a great start to define and aligned on the goals that we ratify as a collective. | On-chain | www.tally.xyz | April 21, 2025 |
OIP#2 Unlock OBOL Token | For | It’s a no-brainer decision to unlock OBOL token for people who have contributed to the protocol. | On-chain | vote.obol.org | March 9, 2025 |
OIP#1: Building and Enabling Staking for the OBOL Token | For | We believe it’s a critical experiment that we should try to see if the governance staking is going to make good impact on the DAO governance as a whole. | On-chain | vote.obol.org | March 9, 2025 |