How to delegate your $OP token
- Go to our Agora page (and read our delegate statement). Connect your wallet that holds $OP token with an OP Mainnet RPC selected. (if you haven’t already.)
- Click “Delegate.”
- Confirm your delegation to tanegov.eth by clicking “Delegate” button and sign the transaction.
Proposal | Our Vote | Rationale | Type of Vote | Voting URL | Vote Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
For | We are excited to observe this experimental initiative managed by Butter and Uniswap Foundation and look forward to seeing the details of the project in coming months. | On-chain | December 18, 2024 | ||
For | It’s critical to hyper-focus on the important metric with other parties aligned. Less budget allocated makes sense as the superchain grants are out of scope from this season. | On-chain | December 18, 2024 | ||
For | We support the Security Council requests and owns its budget from the governance, and operate for the governance. The appropriate compensation balance between the lead and the members can be revisited in the next season. | On-chain | December 18, 2024 | ||
For | The existence of the council has been discussed since the last season and it makes sense for us to dissolve it as the Foundation suggests it will be independent from the power dynamics of the Token House. | On-chain | December 18, 2024 | ||
For | We support the transition of the M&M to an own council to operate under its own budget. The scope of the work is reasonable and Jun from PGov is a great lead to manage the council. | On-chain | December 18, 2024 | ||
For | We support the budget request and changes to the scope of the DAB as the DAB has been critical in the operations of the Grants Council and contributions to the Collective. | On-chain | December 18, 2024 | ||
For | We support the audacious changes to the structure of the council based on the careful considerations on the feedback and learnings in the Season 6. We continue to support the contributions from the Grants Council and other structures in the Collective. | On-chain | December 18, 2024 | ||
For | We believe the Collective still needs this structure to keep the health of the governance. | On-chain | December 16, 2024 | ||
For | We believe hyper-focus on an important north star metric is critical for all the parties involved for the Superchain growth. | On-chain | December 16, 2024 | ||
For | All the proposed changes that are the chain derivation changes, the EIP-1559 elasticity parameter change and the MIPS related changes look reasonable and make sense, to be staged for the future major upgrades. The failure mode analysis provided for these changes is well-thought-out while these changes are not audited according to the Audit Framework. | On-chain | December 16, 2024 | ||
For | Great to see this function to be live soon with diligent testings | On-chain | December 16, 2024 | ||
For | Testing for the treasury transfer from the onchain voting | On-chain | December 4, 2024 | ||
For | The charter has clarified criteria that the Standard Rollups should adhere to. | On-chain | October 30, 2024 | ||
For | We believe it's an important step to more decentralization of the governance. The next big step would be to allow DAO members to permissionlessly create proposals and we should discuss how to achieve them. | On-chain | October 30, 2024 | ||
For | Worth trying to attract applications to tackle this request | On-chain | October 7, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | We believe all the options ranked high by the council deserve to accept applications within this cycle's budget | On-chain | September 16, 2024 | ||
Abstain | Abstain due to our role as a Grants Council member | On-chain | September 16, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | We believe the selection is a great mix of members who has relevant experiences and expertises to serve as the Security Council | On-chain | September 16, 2024 | ||
For | The only candidate and the current lead of SC, who diligently coordinates with appropriate dev members and updates the activities. | On-chain | August 28, 2024 | ||
For | While we have some concern on how the previous upgrade was deployed, this upgrade to fix the vulnerabilities found in the audit should be done anyway | On-chain | August 28, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | We vote for Oxytocin because of their experience as a CoCC member and continuous contributions to the DAO as a delegate, Pumbi and Alex because of their contributions to the DAO and unique experiences, and CryptoReuMD because their completely unique experience and knowledge with the DAO. | On-chain | August 6, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | We chose the requests because we believe they are the most critical to achieve the Intent 3A goal: increase the active developers with quality projects/platforms with the allocated fund. | On-chain | July 17, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | We choose those requests because either technical solutions or research/analysis are critical to increase the votable supply. | On-chain | July 17, 2024 | ||
For | Supporting the OP chains is one of the important Intents in S6 and we are in full support of achieve the goal with the allocated budget. | On-chain | July 17, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | It was tough to choose from candidates with great applications. We value the mix of leadership (Ed), specialized skills (Blockdev for ZK, philogy for auditing), and communication/collaboration/high-context knowledge with the Collective (anika, noah and wbnns) and vote for them accordingly. | On-chain | June 19, 2024 | ||
For | We expected more lower budget increases as discussed in the forum, but appreciate their effort and recognize the need to continue CoCC operation in a continuous way. We will vote against future proposals that only increase budget without consideration of the feedback from delegates, though. | On-chain | June 19, 2024 | ||
For | With the new intent featuring the Superchain strategy and considering the proper participation from the participating chains is necessary for the appropriate "collective" governance, we believe the amendment and the expansion of it are appropriate. | On-chain | June 19, 2024 | ||
For | The amendment and clarification make sense and we support continuity of ACC. | On-chain | June 19, 2024 | ||
For | We have reviewed the specs and the summary of the changes in the call. RIP-7212 change leads to a better UX and we are great to see this and other improvements including the new compression implementation in this upgrade. | On-chain | June 19, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | We appreciate and support their interest from Anthias Labs that has experiences in supporting the grants and providing tools for risk monitoring , and continuous support from SEED Latam team in the program. | On-chain | June 16, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | We are impressed about what Juan has provided and achieved in the Collective, its GC and other prominent DAOs including Uniswap and Arbitrum and what Murphy has been providing with Karma and his service to the Optimism GC. | On-chain | June 16, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | We appreciate all the work and contributions that the Season 5 council Growth Experiments and Builders members and recognize continuous support from them in Season 6. Aside from them, we choose Jrocki, brichis, Sov and ourselves for the new members given the relevancy, expertises and contributions to the Collective so far. | On-chain | June 16, 2024 | ||
For | While we strongly recommend the council to reconsider the rewards, the intention of the council’s inception should be valued and without a particular structure or proposal that is sustainable to address the CoC related matters, we should keep the council running. | On-chain | May 29, 2024 | ||
For | Focused fundings on the new Intent to grow the Superchain makes sense strategically. Supporting the chain-specific grants programs is an interesting approach. We fully support the Intents and their budgets and look forward to the impacts that they make. | On-chain | May 28, 2024 | ||
For | We vote FOR the proposal because it’s essential for the Collective to support a well-established grant system and adjust the rewards based on the increased works and scopes to take on. Organizing a grant system with an appropriate structure is an incredible feat and should be valued. We are excited to see the measurements that the new Grant Council can achieve with updated Intents. OP Chain grants programs are something we particularly look forward. | On-chain | May 28, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | While we appreciate Ed's additional requirements to be presented, less budget increases with the current scope of work led by Zach makes sense to us. | On-chain | May 28, 2024 | ||
For | All of the proposed Intents make perfect sense. Excited to see Intent 2 can make impact on the growth of Optimism ecosystem. | On-chain | May 28, 2024 | ||
For | It’s a minor, but important fix to improve the advanced delegation on Agora. | On-chain | May 28, 2024 | ||
For | It’s great to see the continuous efforts to improve on the security, integrity and decentralization of the rollup. | On-chain | May 28, 2024 | ||
For | Introducing the long-waited fault proofs is clearly one of the most important steps that Optimism should take. Considering the comments from Mofi, we vote FOR the proposal and rely on the coordination with the security council and OP Labs for the timing of the deployment. | On-chain | May 28, 2024 | ||
For | The intension, implementation and audit reports look all good. We support the new addition to the governance system. | On-chain | April 16, 2024 | ||
For | We assume this proposal was created based on careful considerations by the Grants Council and contributors and it’s generally considered optimal to reallocate unused funds to the needed area | On-chain | April 16, 2024 | ||
For | We are voting for the proposal because we are in full support of the activation that adopts EIP-4844 blobs to see a drastic reductions in transaction fees and additional changes to the OP stack from the L1 Dencun improvements. | On-chain | March 6, 2024 | ||
For | We are in support of the proposed specs and implementations. The audit results are good to proceed without small fixes. While we think this change doesn't have to be passed with the Ecotone change, we vote for the proposal. | On-chain | March 6, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | Voted for all requests except for 3B (We'd wait for the impact made by WLTA), 3C (Not quite clear what it can achieve with a huge budget), 3D (Abstain as a dYdX delegate), 3M (Not quite sure if it's worth a mission request) | On-chain | February 14, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | All mission requests have potentials that make impact per token spent. | On-chain | February 14, 2024 | ||
For | The intention to the main changes is reasonable. The specs look good. Other two changes (a fix on a potential issue during an upgrade and token creation related changes) look also good (though the third change seems unrelated to the main changes.) | On-chain | February 14, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | Voted for all requests except for 2K (we’d see if ETHCC one succeeds), 2C (better with Foundation support) and 2I (Agreed with Krzysztof on focusing on phase 1 with less budget) | On-chain | February 14, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | All of those development related requests are promising to make impact depending on applications. | On-chain | February 14, 2024 | ||
For | Now that the CoC exists in Optimism Collective, it makes sense to rely on it to properly manage the issues around grant misusage with the process clearly ratified. | On-chain | January 24, 2024 | ||
For | “Span Batches” to be introduced with this upgrade reduces the L1 costs for OP chains, which is nothing but great for the Optimism ecosystem. | On-chain | January 24, 2024 | ||
For | While we agree with the points that prominent delegates who voted abstain, we believe the motivation and the selection of the members are solid and meaningful for Optimism, thus we vote for the ratification of the council members selected by the Foundation. | On-chain | December 5, 2023 | ||
For | No objection to include well-tested and less critical changes to the protocol into the Optimism stacks. Side note: great summary of the upgrade in the forum, but the proposal description can better incorporate it with organized structure. | On-chain | December 5, 2023 | ||
Top Choices | MMhurthy for his experiences in building Karma, Raho for his contributions to the Arbitrum STIP, and Curia for their continuous contributions to the protocols | On-chain | November 15, 2023 | ||
Top Choices | Chose Jack Anorak and Gonna.eth for their technical capabilities and Kaereste for their involvement as L2BEAT | On-chain | November 15, 2023 | ||
Top Choices | Chose those three for their activities and contributions in the forum | On-chain | November 15, 2023 | ||
Top Choices | Chose 3 members for their experience in Optimism governance and 2 members for their expertises to be effective to resolve conflicts based on CoC | On-chain | November 14, 2023 | ||
For | This is a critical step to structure rules for chains using OP Stack to be aligned and grow together as an alliance | On-chain | November 14, 2023 | ||
For | It’s good for the Collective to be responsible for the budgets and spends on all Intents going forward in the coming Seasons. The budgets seem reasonable and we are looking forward to the outcome made by the initiatives supported by them. | On-chain | November 14, 2023 | ||
For | While many unclear points are not being discussed (e.g. how to select a chain and how much tokens to delegate, etc), this is important for the Optimism family to grow based on shared vision and aligned incentives | On-chain | November 14, 2023 |