If you are looking for information about Tané Labs, our investment/incubation arm and its portfolio, please check out https://tanelabs.com/.
Tanè is running crypto network operations, namely running validators and participating in protocols’ DAO governance as delegates in addition to the investment/incubation.
This page is to show our activities and present information for you to support us by delegating your tokens to us.
Validators
We believe in the power of decentralization and the decentralized systems like blockchains. Validators are the essential components to keep blockchain running and delivering values to applications and their users. Since we are determined to contribute to Web3 projects as well as investments to them, we are running validators for them.
‣
私たちは、分散化とブロックチェーンのような分散型システムの力を信じています。バリデーターは、ブロックチェーンを稼働させ、その上で動くアプリケーションとそのユーザーに価値を提供し続けるために不可欠なコンポーネントです。Tanéは、Web3プロジェクトに投資するだけでなく、Web3プロジェクトに貢献するために、プロトコルのためのバリデーターを運営しています。
DAO Governance
DAO Governance should come with running validators. Validators are the key stakeholders and critical participants in each project which is going to become its DAO. Proactive participations like having civil and constructive discussions, making proposals and contributing to decisions to be made in the DAO can be meaningful and critical for the DAO to be successful in the long run.
‣
DAOガバナンスはバリデーターを運営するのと同時に行うべきです。バリデーターは重要なステークホルダーであり、DAOとなるプロジェクトへの大事な参加者です。建設的な議論や、提案、DAOに対する意思決定に対して積極的に参加することが、長期的に見てDAOを成功させるために意義があり、重要であると考えています。
All voting activities
| Proposal | 📡 Protocol | Our Vote | Type of Vote | Rationale | URL | Vote Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For | On-chain | No objection to include well-tested and less critical changes to the protocol into the Optimism stacks. Side note: great summary of the upgrade in the forum, but the proposal description can better incorporate it with organized structure. | December 5, 2023 | |||
For | On-chain | While we agree with the points that prominent delegates who voted abstain, we believe the motivation and the selection of the members are solid and meaningful for Optimism, thus we vote for the ratification of the council members selected by the Foundation. | December 5, 2023 | |||
Yes | On-chain | While it’s not an ideal solution, the social committee approach is the best mitigation solution that we can apply at this point. We also expect the capable group of contributors to come up with a framework to better address the MEV in the future. | November 30, 2023 | |||
Yes | On-chain | It’s critical to move forward with the incentive programs despite the fact that there are still concerns on the centralization of staking to top X validators. We expect users/traders/stakers to stake more once the trading ramps up the volume and staking APR is available for them. | November 25, 2023 | |||
Top Choices | On-chain | Chose those three for their activities and contributions in the forum | November 15, 2023 | |||
Top Choices | On-chain | Chose Jack Anorak and Gonna.eth for their technical capabilities and Kaereste for their involvement as L2BEAT | November 15, 2023 | |||
Top Choices | On-chain | MMhurthy for his experiences in building Karma, Raho for his contributions to the Arbitrum STIP, and Curia for their continuous contributions to the protocols | November 15, 2023 | |||
For | On-chain | While many unclear points are not being discussed (e.g. how to select a chain and how much tokens to delegate, etc), this is important for the Optimism family to grow based on shared vision and aligned incentives | November 14, 2023 | |||
For | On-chain | It’s good for the Collective to be responsible for the budgets and spends on all Intents going forward in the coming Seasons. The budgets seem reasonable and we are looking forward to the outcome made by the initiatives supported by them. | November 14, 2023 | |||
For | On-chain | This is a critical step to structure rules for chains using OP Stack to be aligned and grow together as an alliance | November 14, 2023 | |||
Top Choices | On-chain | Chose 3 members for their experience in Optimism governance and 2 members for their expertises to be effective to resolve conflicts based on CoC | November 14, 2023 | |||
Yes | On-chain | We believe we are ready to go for the trading with all markets available on the dYdX Chain | November 10, 2023 | |||
Against | Off-chain | The idea of having an organization like this is appealing but the details, structure and framework need to be further discussed and reach to consensus before deciding to fund it | November 10, 2023 | |||
For | Off-chain | November 10, 2023 | ||||
Against | Off-chain | DAO shouldn’t reward contributors without the information about who they are, what each of them has done and how they are selected and others are not. | October 31, 2023 | |||
Yes | Off-chain | This bridging of the Community and Rewards Treasuries is the critical step to properly bootstrap the dYdX Chain with the proposed Launch Incentive Program and other initiatives, and it’s important for the community to fully support its implementation and execution. | October 20, 2023 | |||
Harry Kalodoner | On-chain | The most important expertise required for a security council member is the deep knowledge with the protocol tech stacks and Harry, CTO of Offchain Labs is undoubtedly the best candidate. | October 13, 2023 | |||
Against | Off-chain | While we believe the security is paramountly important in the self-custody environment and what Webacy has been doing is clearly beneficial to the whole ecosystem, there are a couple of reasons that the proposal is not fit for STIP grant distributions: 1) the justification of the requested grant size is weak compared to the outcome. 2) incentives are prone to sybil attacks 3) not clear incentives to Arbitrum itself | October 12, 2023 | |||
For | Off-chain | Camelot kicked off this STIP movement, and diligently tried to get aligned with what it can do for Arbitrum throughout the process. Definitely beneficial for Arbitrum to have Camelot thrive as one of the household names. | October 12, 2023 | |||
Abstain | Off-chain | While Vertex is an interesting protocol to thrive in Arbitrum, we abstain because we are an Endorsed Delegate of dYdX which is the direct competitor of Vertex from users’ perspective. | October 12, 2023 | |||
For | Off-chain | Tally’s mission is to advance on-chain governance further and it’s aligned very well with L2 like Arbitrum because of its lower gas. The requested grant size is reasonable and we believe that the Tally team is diligently allocating them to the DAOs on Arbitrum, which would make impact on Arbitrum with the great governance tool. | October 12, 2023 | |||
Against | Off-chain | On top of the raised concerns around dominance of stETH in Ethereum, the justifications of the grant size seems weak and off as stETH related trading volume is already huge. We would like Lido to propose their request in another way, address concerns and focus on properly introducing the native stETH in Arbitrum. | October 12, 2023 | |||
For | Off-chain | unshETH is very unique and natively supported on Arbitrum. It’s good to contribute to decentralization of liquid staking tokens. The requested grant size is reasonable. | October 12, 2023 | |||
For | Off-chain | We’ve seen their founders active in the NYC crypto meetups and spoken highly of Arbitrum in terms of experiences on the platform. The reasonable requested grant size. We believe the incentive is to be used to promote more interesting use within the ecosystem. | October 12, 2023 | |||
For | Off-chain | Pendle is bringing interest derivative market into DeFi and evolving the ecosystem with unique offerings. The requested grant size is reasonable and set out to be used efficiently. | October 12, 2023 | |||
Abstain | Off-chain | While GMX is a leading protocol to thrive in Arbitrum, we abstain because we are an Endorsed Delegate of dYdX which is the direct competitor of GMX from users’ perspective. | October 12, 2023 |
Contacts
Please reach out to us at takeshi@tanelabs.com or ikuma@tanelabs.com or fill out the form at https://tanelabs.com/.
Databases