Roles
Delegate
How to delegate your ARB
- Go to our Tally’s page.
- Click “Delegate” and connect your wallet that holds your ARB token with an Arbitrum One Mainnet RPC selected.
- Click “Delegate votes” and sign the transaction.
| Proposal | Our Vote | Rationale | Type of Vote | URL | Vote Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For | GovHack in ETHDenver was a success in terms of connecting the delegates, contributors and core team members (Foundation and OCL) to have a opportunity to gather and discuss important topics in the Arbitrum DAO. We enjoyed the event as a whole and fully support the succeeding one in Brussels. | Off-chain | May 1, 2024 | ||
Abstain | We generally agree with GFX Labs’ take on the process of having the applications immediately after the official application period. While there are some good ones, we believe they should have waited for the next round of the grant program (either the next LTIPP or a permanent program) to be ready. Only Curve one is an exception as it’s not marked as an LTIPP application and huge commitment promised by the Curve founder with a well-crafted application. | Off-chain | May 1, 2024 | ||
For | The proposal has been updated with additional commitments from the LTIPP advisors and promised program manager role as well as the data and audit reports by OBL for us to evaluate the results by the STIP and optimistically approve the additional fundings. | On-chain | May 1, 2024 | ||
Weighted Choices | While we vote for this option to signal the support for the overall initiative, we expect it to be revised by incorporating feedback | Off-chain | April 25, 2024 | ||
Weighted Choices | We generally support the initiative while the exact amount for the Arbitrum DAO to offer can be discussed more before the on-chain voting | Off-chain | April 24, 2024 | ||
For | We consider this proposal as a good experiment to enhance the powers that retail users have with the leverage powered by the product aligned with the Arbitrum vision. | Off-chain | April 23, 2024 | ||
Weighted Choices | Chose candidates for 1) Arbitrum codebase expert (fred) 2) security expert (Certora) 3) Arbitrum ecosystem expert (bartek.eth from L2BEAT) based on background diversity, technical capabilities and geographical diversity. 4k for bartek, 4k for Certora, and other 5k+ for fred. | On-chain | April 16, 2024 | ||
For | We vote FOR the continuation of the program and the updated compensations for DA and PM as we did at its temp check voting. We have also confirmed that Questbook team suggest annual re-elections of the members which was a concern at the Snapshot phase and appropriately addressed in the forum. | On-chain | April 16, 2024 | ||
Described in page | Because of clear guidance provided by the council, we vote for most of the protocols besides some exceptions described in the the page. | Off-chain | April 14, 2024 → April 15, 2024 | ||
For | We’d like to express full support of the initiative that covers a list of necessary improvements to be done for the better DAO operations by all parties and we are looking forward to seeing a great DAO tooling product thrive with the growth of the Arbitrum DAO. | On-chain | April 12, 2024 | ||
For | We recognize the contributions by the early contributors and consider the rewards reasonable as a one-off. | On-chain | April 12, 2024 | ||
For | Great step to experiment treasury diversifications with a group of experienced service providers to lead the program | On-chain | April 6, 2024 | ||
Against | We vote against it because we believe it's simply too rushed and more analysis is required for the experiment to be funded further. | Off-chain | March 29, 2024 | ||
Described in page | Voted for Jordan from Event Horizon as other prominent candidates are already qualified for the next round | On-chain | March 29, 2024 | ||
For | We appreciate the effort that PL has put in and agree with the lessons that they will address with the renewed budget and structure. | On-chain | March 26, 2024 | ||
For | The proposal covers a list of necessary improvements to be done for the better DAO operations by all parties and we are looking forward to seeing a great DAO tooling product thrive with the growth of the Arbitrum DAO. | Off-chain | March 24, 2024 | ||
For | While the budget appears huge, the Arbitrum DAO needs to catch up with other L2 to make it home for the gaming projects and the initiative is much needed for the purpose. | Off-chain | March 22, 2024 | ||
For | We believe it’s important to provide a non-developer friendly UI to force transaction inclusions and WakeUp team should be able to provide this with reasonable compensations. | Off-chain | March 17, 2024 | ||
For | We support the continuation of the program and the updated compensations for DA and PM. We also echo others who mentioned that the renewal of the DAs should be discussed and up for election in the future. | Off-chain | March 15, 2024 | ||
Ranked Choices | We are voting in favor of “Set L1 Surplus Fee and L2 Minimum Base Fee” because we believe DAO should prioritize UX over revenue at this moment. | Off-chain | March 11, 2024 | ||
Weighted Choices | 40% each on Trail of Bits and OpenZeppelin, renowned security experts and 20% on Halborn who has started being involved in Arbitrum DAO with their great track record. | Off-chain | March 11, 2024 | ||
Selected Choices | We are in favor of electing Chaos Labs because their track record related to risk assessment is great and the only candidate. | Off-chain | March 10, 2024 | ||
Weighted Choices | 100% on L2BEAT/Ant Federation because what L2BEAT has done to Arbitrum and the ecosystem is amazing and a great candidate working with Ant Federation. | Off-chain | March 10, 2024 | ||
Weighted Choices | 100% on Blockworks/Delphi because members who are more dedicated to Arbitrum DAO are involved while The Block is a prominent candidate for the Research Member | Off-chain | March 10, 2024 | ||
For | We appreciate the effort by Offchain Labs to support EIP-4844 swiftly for the upcoming mainnet release and are confident these improvements make positive impact on the Arbitrum ecosystem. | On-chain | February 23, 2024 | ||
For | The motivation and implementations are reasonable and we believe this change leads to a better election process of the Security Council members. | On-chain | February 23, 2024 | ||
For | As stated in our snapshot voting, we believe the pilot program has been improved with new actors and considerable thoughts and effort so that it will make impact to the growth of the Arbitrum ecosystem. | On-chain | February 16, 2024 | ||
Against | We appreciate all the work put by Arbiters during the launch of Arbitrum, but are against their retro rewards because 1) they have already received some compensations from the Foundation. 2) there were no key measurements or criteria set for the rewards when it comes to managing the Discord community. It should have been clearly discussed beforehand with the Foundation or whoever manages the Discord or local communities. | Off-chain | February 11, 2024 | ||
For | Both changes make sense and the code is simple with unit tests and audit by ToB. | Off-chain | February 11, 2024 | ||
Against | This should be evaluated based on a specific framework and by a group of members who are experienced in gaming and its grant system. | Off-chain | February 11, 2024 | ||
For | Great step to experiment treasury diversifications with a group of experienced service providers to lead the program | Off-chain | February 7, 2024 | ||
For | The motivation and implementations are reasonable and we believe this change leads to a better election process of the Security Council members. | Off-chain | February 4, 2024 | ||
For | It’s favorable to form a committee to be specialized in procurement for the DAO and we have a great selection of members working on this initiative. | On-chain | February 3, 2024 | ||
Weighted Choices | Voted 40% for Joseph as he should lead the committee, voted 30% each for Jeff and Bernard to support him with ample experiences that they have | Off-chain | January 29, 2024 | ||
Described in page | To achieve the revised Stage1 designation, we believe increasing the threshold to 9/12 is the vital first step to improve the council | Off-chain | January 24, 2024 | ||
For | We believe this is the essential first step to rewards active delegates and continuous commitments from existing and new dedicated participants to the DAO. We appreciate the careful considerations and clearly outlined evaluation process. | On-chain | January 22, 2024 | ||
For | We are in support of the initiative to go forward after the diligent considerations and amendments made to improve the original proposal. It's great to see a democratic process to choose the service providers to address issues that have been discussed for a while. | On-chain | January 22, 2024 | ||
Top Choices | Chose 3 candidates. Clarified the reasonings in the description. | Off-chain | January 21, 2024 | ||
Top Choices | Off-chain | January 21, 2024 | |||
Ranked Choices | An improved version of the STIP and we believe it's worth trying it as a pilot | Off-chain | January 9, 2024 | ||
For | No reason to oppose to continuous updates to the Arbitrum stack | On-chain | January 5, 2024 | ||
Against | The idea of having an organization like this is appealing but the details, structure and framework need to be further discussed and reach to consensus before deciding to fund it | Off-chain | November 10, 2023 | ||
For | No reason to be against the idea of the consolidation | Off-chain | November 10, 2023 | ||
Against | DAO shouldn’t reward contributors without the information about who they are, what each of them has done and how they are selected and others are not. | Off-chain | October 31, 2023 | ||
Top Choices | The most important expertise required for a security council member is the deep knowledge with the protocol tech stacks and Harry, CTO of Offchain Labs is undoubtedly the best candidate. | On-chain | October 13, 2023 | ||
Abstain | While GMX is a leading protocol to thrive in Arbitrum, we abstain because we are an Endorsed Delegate of dYdX which is the direct competitor of GMX from users’ perspective. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
For | Pendle is bringing interest derivative market into DeFi and evolving the ecosystem with unique offerings. The requested grant size is reasonable and set out to be used efficiently. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
For | We’ve seen their founders active in the NYC crypto meetups and spoken highly of Arbitrum in terms of experiences on the platform. The reasonable requested grant size. We believe the incentive is to be used to promote more interesting use within the ecosystem. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
For | unshETH is very unique and natively supported on Arbitrum. It’s good to contribute to decentralization of liquid staking tokens. The requested grant size is reasonable. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
Against | On top of the raised concerns around dominance of stETH in Ethereum, the justifications of the grant size seems weak and off as stETH related trading volume is already huge. We would like Lido to propose their request in another way, address concerns and focus on properly introducing the native stETH in Arbitrum. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
For | Tally’s mission is to advance on-chain governance further and it’s aligned very well with L2 like Arbitrum because of its lower gas. The requested grant size is reasonable and we believe that the Tally team is diligently allocating them to the DAOs on Arbitrum, which would make impact on Arbitrum with the great governance tool. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
Abstain | While Vertex is an interesting protocol to thrive in Arbitrum, we abstain because we are an Endorsed Delegate of dYdX which is the direct competitor of Vertex from users’ perspective. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
Against | While we believe the security is paramountly important in the self-custody environment and what Webacy has been doing is clearly beneficial to the whole ecosystem, there are a couple of reasons that the proposal is not fit for STIP grant distributions: 1) the justification of the requested grant size is weak compared to the outcome. 2) incentives are prone to sybil attacks 3) not clear incentives to Arbitrum itself | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
For | Camelot kicked off this STIP movement, and diligently tried to get aligned with what it can do for Arbitrum throughout the process. Definitely beneficial for Arbitrum to have Camelot thrive as one of the household names. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 |