Roles
Delegate
How to delegate your ARB
- Go to our Tally’s page
- Click “Delegate” and connect your wallet that holds your ARB token with an Arbitrum One Mainnet RPC
- Click “Delegate votes” and sign the transaction
Past Activities
Proposal | Our Vote | Rationale | Type of Vote | URL | Vote Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Against | The idea of having an organization like this is appealing but the details, structure and framework need to be further discussed and reach to consensus before deciding to fund it | Off-chain | November 10, 2023 | ||
For | Off-chain | November 10, 2023 | |||
Against | DAO shouldn’t reward contributors without the information about who they are, what each of them has done and how they are selected and others are not. | Off-chain | October 31, 2023 | ||
Harry Kalodoner | The most important expertise required for a security council member is the deep knowledge with the protocol tech stacks and Harry, CTO of Offchain Labs is undoubtedly the best candidate. | On-chain | October 13, 2023 | ||
Abstain | While GMX is a leading protocol to thrive in Arbitrum, we abstain because we are an Endorsed Delegate of dYdX which is the direct competitor of GMX from users’ perspective. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
For | Pendle is bringing interest derivative market into DeFi and evolving the ecosystem with unique offerings. The requested grant size is reasonable and set out to be used efficiently. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
For | We’ve seen their founders active in the NYC crypto meetups and spoken highly of Arbitrum in terms of experiences on the platform. The reasonable requested grant size. We believe the incentive is to be used to promote more interesting use within the ecosystem. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
For | unshETH is very unique and natively supported on Arbitrum. It’s good to contribute to decentralization of liquid staking tokens. The requested grant size is reasonable. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
Against | On top of the raised concerns around dominance of stETH in Ethereum, the justifications of the grant size seems weak and off as stETH related trading volume is already huge. We would like Lido to propose their request in another way, address concerns and focus on properly introducing the native stETH in Arbitrum. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
For | Tally’s mission is to advance on-chain governance further and it’s aligned very well with L2 like Arbitrum because of its lower gas. The requested grant size is reasonable and we believe that the Tally team is diligently allocating them to the DAOs on Arbitrum, which would make impact on Arbitrum with the great governance tool. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
Abstain | While Vertex is an interesting protocol to thrive in Arbitrum, we abstain because we are an Endorsed Delegate of dYdX which is the direct competitor of Vertex from users’ perspective. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
Against | While we believe the security is paramountly important in the self-custody environment and what Webacy has been doing is clearly beneficial to the whole ecosystem, there are a couple of reasons that the proposal is not fit for STIP grant distributions: 1) the justification of the requested grant size is weak compared to the outcome. 2) incentives are prone to sybil attacks 3) not clear incentives to Arbitrum itself | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 | ||
For | Camelot kicked off this STIP movement, and diligently tried to get aligned with what it can do for Arbitrum throughout the process. Definitely beneficial for Arbitrum to have Camelot thrive as one of the household names. | Off-chain | October 12, 2023 |